with other subs/slaves
Competing against other submissives, often for the attention or favor of a dominant partner. Short Explanation: "Receiving" means you are one of the submissives competing; "Giving" means you, as the dominant, choose the preferred one.
Interested in exploring with other subs/slaves with your partner?
Start Your ChecklistPlaying with other submissives or slaves within D/s dynamics creates unique configurations where multiple people share the submissive role under one dominants authority. This arrangement offers experiences distinct from both dyadic D/s and general multi-person play—the particular dynamics of multiple submissives interacting with each other while serving the same dominant create their own richness and challenges.
The appeal varies among participants. Some dominants enjoy the complexity of managing multiple submissives simultaneously. Some submissives find connection with others who share their orientation valuable. The interplay between submissives—whether cooperative, competitive, or somewhere between—adds dimensions impossible in two-person dynamics.
This guide explores how multi-submissive configurations function, the dynamics between submissives themselves, considerations for all participants, and how to navigate the particular challenges and opportunities these arrangements present.
How Multi-Submissive Dynamics Work
When multiple submissives serve one dominant, relationships exist in several directions: each submissive to the dominant, the submissives to each other, and the group as a collective entity. Each of these relationship dimensions requires attention and development.
The dominant manages not just individual submissives but the overall configuration—balancing attention, managing interactions between submissives, and maintaining dynamic integrity across the whole structure. This demands different skills than managing a single submissive relationship.
Configuration Types
Stable households where multiple submissives live with and serve one dominant represent one end of the spectrum. These long-term arrangements develop their own internal cultures, hierarchies, and norms over time.
Scene-based configurations bring multiple submissives together for specific activities without ongoing structural relationship. These might be regular occurrences or special occasions, with dynamics resetting between encounters.
Primary/secondary structures establish hierarchy among submissives, with one holding privileged position. This formalization clarifies expectations but requires careful management to prevent resentment or neglect.
Egalitarian models treat all submissives as holding equivalent status. This approach avoids hierarchy complications but requires the dominant to actively balance attention without formal structure guiding allocation.
Submissive-to-Submissive Dynamics
Cooperative dynamics have submissives working together in service, supporting each other, and finding solidarity in shared position. This creates warm, family-like atmospheres where submissives are allies rather than competitors.
Competitive dynamics introduce rivalry for dominants attention, favor, or status. Some dominants deliberately cultivate competition; others prefer cooperation. Clear expectations help submissives understand what dynamic is intended.
Sexual interaction between submissives may or may not be part of the configuration. Some arrangements include submissives playing together; others maintain them as separate relationships that happen to share a dominant. Explicit discussion clarifies expectations.
Mentorship relationships sometimes develop between more experienced and newer submissives. Established submissives can help newcomers understand expectations, learn protocols, and navigate the dynamics particular to that relationship structure.
Safety Considerations
Multi-submissive configurations introduce safety considerations beyond those in dyadic D/s or general multi-person play. The power differential combined with multiple relationships creates specific risks.
Physical Safety
Tracking multiple submissives during scenes requires active attention. Dominants must maintain awareness of all participants conditions, not just whoever currently has focus. Neglected submissives can experience drops, injuries, or emergencies without notice.
Physical interactions between submissives require their own negotiation and consent. The dominants authority does not automatically extend to ordering one submissive to do things to another without both parties consent.
STI considerations become more complex with additional participants. Clear agreements about safer sex practices, testing schedules, and acceptable activities help manage increased transmission risk.
Emotional Safety
Jealousy and comparison affect many multi-submissive configurations. Even secure submissives may struggle when attention goes elsewhere, when others receive different treatment, or when newcomers enter established dynamics. These feelings deserve acknowledgment and processing.
Favoritism—real or perceived—creates tension. Dominants must balance attention thoughtfully while acknowledging that perfect equality is neither possible nor necessarily desirable. Transparency about how decisions are made helps submissives understand their position.
New submissives entering established configurations face particular vulnerability. Existing relationships have history, shared understanding, and established patterns. Newcomers may feel perpetually behind, uncertain of their place, or pressure to prove themselves quickly.
Individual relationships need attention amid group dynamics. Each submissive deserves time, attention, and relationship development with the dominant—not just group experiences. Neglecting one-on-one connection undermines individual relationships.
Red Flags
Using submissives against each other—deliberately creating conflict, punishing one for anothers actions, or triangulating—indicates unhealthy dynamics requiring examination.
One submissive consistently neglected while others receive attention signals management failure. All participants deserve adequate attention to their needs.
Pressure on submissives to accept each other or engage together without genuine consent manipulates rather than leads. Authentic multi-submissive dynamics develop through genuine connection, not coercion.
Beginners Guide
Approaching multi-submissive dynamics—whether as dominant or submissive—benefits from careful, incremental development rather than sudden expansion.
For dominants: honestly assess your capacity before adding submissives. Each relationship requires time, attention, and energy. Managing multiple submissives demands more than the sum of individual relationships. Start with two before considering more; learn what multiple relationships require before expanding further.
For submissives: consider your genuine feelings about sharing your dominant before agreeing. The abstract idea may appeal differently than lived reality. Talk with others who have experience in similar configurations about what it actually involves.
Establish clear agreements about structure, expectations, and boundaries before introducing new participants. Existing partners deserve voice in how expansion happens. Newcomers deserve clear understanding of what they are entering.
Build relationships between all participants, not just between each submissive and the dominant. Group activities, shared experiences, and direct interaction help develop the multiple relationships that make configurations function well.
Expect adjustment periods when configurations change. Adding new members disrupts existing equilibrium; all participants need time to find new balance. Patience with this process prevents premature conclusions about fit.
Discussing with Your Partner
Conversations about multi-submissive configurations touch on relationship security, jealousy, and fundamental relationship structure. These discussions require care regardless of which role you occupy.
For dominants wishing to add submissives: explain what appeals about expansion. Is it specific desires current relationship does not fulfill? General interest in managing multiple people? Desire for particular dynamics only possible with multiple submissives? Clear articulation helps partners engage with actual interest.
For submissives interested in sharing: distinguish between fantasy and genuine desire. The idea of sister-submissives may appeal differently than the reality of sharing attention, negotiating interactions, and processing jealousy. Be honest about what you actually want versus what sounds exciting.
Discuss specific concerns openly. What would feel like betrayal? What would help maintain security? What hard limits exist around how additional relationships develop? Concrete discussion prevents painful surprises.
Establish existing partners voice in decisions. While dominants may hold authority in the dynamic, healthy expansion respects current partners perspectives on changes affecting their lives. Collaboration on process does not undermine authority.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do submissives in the same dynamic have to be sexual with each other?
Not unless all parties genuinely want this. Multi-submissive configurations can function with submissives being entirely separate relationships that happen to share a dominant, or can include various levels of interaction between submissives. Configuration should match all participants actual desires, not assumptions about how things should work.
How do dominants balance attention between multiple submissives?
Through deliberate scheduling, clear communication, and ongoing assessment. Some use formal structures (designated time with each); others flow more organically. Neither approach is universally better, but the chosen approach should be transparent to all submissives so expectations align with reality.
What if I feel jealous of another submissive?
Jealousy is common and valid. Acknowledge it rather than suppressing; discuss with your dominant and potentially with the other submissive(s). Examine what specifically triggers jealousy—often it points to needs that can be addressed within the dynamic rather than requiring dynamic dissolution.
Can hierarchies among submissives work healthily?
Yes, when established transparently, managed fairly, and accepted genuinely by all participants. First/primary positions should not mean others are neglected; junior positions should not feel permanently disadvantaged. Healthy hierarchies clarify structure while respecting all participants.
What happens if submissives do not get along?
Conflict between submissives requires attention. Sometimes mediation resolves issues; sometimes personalities simply do not mesh. The dominant bears responsibility for managing the overall configuration, which may mean acknowledging that particular combinations do not work. Forced relationships benefit no one.
Discover What You Both Desire
Create your personal checklist and compare with your partner to find activities you'll both enjoy exploring together.
Get Started FreeNo credit card required